Saturday, 25 August 2012

Prince Harry has an arse- big deal!

So it would appear that Prince Harry has an arse
Hold the front page!
As a matter of fact not only has Prince Harry got an arse but he is an arse.
He is a highly privileged younger son of another arse  who has even fewer redeeming features.
Harry is an average arrogant satrap whom the popular press are portraying as 'just a high spirited young soldier'.
Well if the British Army is full of 'high spirited young soldiers'who can afford to blow £450 on a bottle of vodka and rent a hotel room in  Vegas for a couple of thousand a  night then clearly we are paying our soldiers far too much.
Get rid of the National Debt? Simples-cut back the salary of army officers for a few weeks.

The story,such that it is,should not be about a 27 year old posh boy flashing his bollocks or wresting with a blonde bimbo in his hotel suite.
A suite incidentally where along with his expensive armed police protection unit he was able to fit in another 25 merry pranksters guzzling his vodka and champagne.
Sorry I got that wrong, it was NOT his vodka and champagne it was OUR vodka and champagne.
Of course we will be told that the boy billiard player is of course using his money, the vast sums he earns as an army officer supplemented by what his Mum left him in his trust fund,plus what his Gran doles out in pocket money (except of course he appears to have no pockets).
But none of that is strictly true other than the wage he gets for being in the armed forces.Whatever he gets from his mothers trust fund was money that she got in her divorce settlement from Charles.
And where did he get his millions from?
Why the same place his Gran gets all her millions from-us!

An awful lot of decent people are taken in by the romance and grandeur of a bunch of minor German aristocrats.Look how hard the Saxe-Coberg-Gothas work is a frequent refrain.
Well if putting one foot in front of another,shaking a few hands and behaving as ifv the world owes them a living-I suppose you can call that working.

The mantra ofv the coalition is that we are all in this together!-well it would appear that some of us can jet off to the fleshpots of Vegas at the drop of a coronet and have a fine old time at our expense.

The royals are a collection of parasites that have no capacity to inspire,no capacity to lead and deserve oblivion not fawning and amazement that they each have an arse.

Every time the issue of the purpose of the monarchy is questioned the loyal subjects bleat that the alternative would be too awful to contemplate.What would happen if we had a President Putin, or worse a President Blair.
Well if we had a President at some time they would have to stand for election(unless of course you were Putin) and even the worst of them would pass on  eventually.(Unless it was the Kim Il dynasty of course)

But the Presidential model is not the only one available,it is probably a good thing to have a ceremonial head of state,a bit like the Mayor of a town,but it is not essential.It would be perfectly possible for a mature parliamentary democracy like this one to get by without a Lord High Heid Yin.

And if all else fails there is always the Speaker of the House of Commons-Bercow the First! 


  1. I misread the above and thought this blog started with "Prince Harry is an arse" not has an arse.

    Good to see your anti monarchy sentiment remains so strong, but how about President Harry? After all he has little royal blood in his line?

  2. john.
    my comment page on tonys clarkes blog is blocked.

    i can get him on all blogs, but the one we was using.

    but one blog is as good as the other,i may have done some thing wrong my self to stop it.

    but i can not stop thinking it has some thing to do with above blog as both you and tony have comments on that.

    as you know on the 19/oct you could not remember
    the above asked me to explain the contents and the swear words you used. rather strange i thougt.

    rather stranger, on the 21 you made rather very strange threat,you wrote, that if i wrote any more of the above blog,you would pour scorn.and mock me.very childish.

    but i think my block on tonys blog may be,some thing to do with what has been suggested to me by others. that owing to the footballers calling each other names.
    and the mp,who lost his job for swearing at the police.your blog of above may be classed in the same way.

    maybe someone will readthis and know how to handle it.

    if you reply to this,i will not enter into our tom and jerry cartoon act again.

  3. You may be interested to know that the word 'arse' appeared in Geoffrey Chaucer's 'Canterbury Tales',a set book in my 'A' level course almost 50 years ago.

  4. break my word.

    you may be interested to know that the word that the word bollxxxx.appeared in john dickies blog of 25/aug/2012. author, john dickie

  5. Anon,
    You really are a contrary arse! On TC's blog you whinged about the use of 'arse', when it's history is drawn to your attention you switch to bollocks!
    Now which is it you miserable prudish git?
    Arse or bollocks-note not with an x, that is the American spelling?
    By the way could you try and use capital letters in the appropriate way,not simply at random.
    Or would you rather I sent back your contributions corrected?